Loading…
government
Hosted by Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden · government · EN-US · 20 episodes
The Chuck and Julie Show are longtime radio hosts and commentators. Their program is a live Internet call-in talk show providing thought provoking information, conversation and entertainment. They are dedicated to free speech and critical thinking and any and all opinions are welcome. If you want the truth straight up and enjoy passionate debate this is the show for you.
Required Pod Score for this show. PitchCentric checks your profile against host openness, topical fit, and audience signals before you generate a pitch.
Contact path
Verified email
Booking probability
29%
Guest openness
Selective
Sign up to generate a grounded pitch for Chuck and Julie Show with Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden.
Signup to Generate a PitchChuck and Julie Show with Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden is a government podcast hosted by Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden, with 20 episodes on record and a Required Pod Score of 80. PitchCentric scores this show on Booking Probability, Listen Score, and live audience signals refreshed every 24 hours.
Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden hosts Chuck and Julie Show with Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden, a government show with 20 episodes published.
Our AI reads these to draft pitches. Use them as grounding for a pitch that cites a real guest and a specific topic.
Chuck and Julie Show with Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden
The rise of citizen initiatives on the ballot is completely changing the face of Colorado elections and making the official GOP and Dem parties irrelevant.
Chuck and Julie Show with Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden
PROMO: Prof Janice Fiamengo joins the show to talk about her new book - The Goddess that Failed, Feminism’s unending war against men, families and civilization itself.
Chuck and Julie Show with Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden
Chuck And Julie Show with Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden COVID Reckoning, Fauci Fallout, and the Culture-War Fight Over Women’s Sports Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden host The Chuck and Julie Show with guest Dr. Brian Joondeph for a sharp political and cultural discussion on COVID-era policy, Fauci logs and accountability, media complicity, medical trust, censorship, midterms, the WNBA transgender-athlete controversy, and broader debates over science, institutions, race, gender, and political power. In December of 2020 Dr.Brian Joondeph was criticized for what a liberal writer called his “contrarian” COVID views. Turns out Joondeph was right… while Fauci lied to us all along. He joins the show today to let us know if the reporter ever corrected his story. Guest Spotlight: Dr. Brian Joondeph This episode of The Chuck and Julie Show, hosted by Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden, features guest Dr. Brian Joondeph, identified in the corrected transcript as a guest commentator and physician. The transcript notes that statements involving politics, medicine, COVID policy, elections, race, gender, public figures, and other disputed topics are preserved as speaker claims and opinions rather than verified facts. COVID Contrarians, Fauci, and the Westword Article Chuck and Julie open by introducing Dr. Brian Joondeph and revisiting a 2020 Westword column that had described his COVID views as contrarian. Julie asks whether the writer has followed up now that, in her view, more information has emerged supporting many of the objections raised during the COVID era. Dr. Joondeph responds that he has not heard from the writer and jokes that Dr. Fauci’s own diary appears to have been more “contrarian” than Fauci’s public statements. This sets up the main interview theme: how public-health narratives were shaped, defended, enforced, and later left without clear accountability. Public-Health Rules, Censorship, and Institutional Trust The conversation moves into masks, distancing, PCR testing, COVID death counts, school closures, church closures, business shutdowns, riots, and the contradictions of elite behavior. Dr. Joondeph argues that physicians and commentators who challenged the COVID consensus risked professional punishment, censorship, deplatforming, or threats to their licenses. He also criticizes the use of PCR testing as a mass-screening tool and says COVID death numbers were overstated. Chuck and Julie frame the larger issue as a collapse of trust in journalists, doctors, public-health institutions, and political leaders who, in their view, pushed rules on the public while exempting themselves. Fauci Logs, Celebrity Culture, and Accountability The hosts and Dr. Joondeph then discuss newly discussed Fauci logs, diary entries, private communications, and public statements. Dr. Joondeph argues that Fauci said one thing privately and another publicly, especially around lab-origin possibilities, masks, distancing, and vaccine messaging. He also criticizes Fauci’s celebrity status, describing him as starstruck and distracted by contact with famous figures while ordinary people were dealing with hospital isolation, mandates, and fear. Julie and Chuck repeatedly ask where accountability is, while Dr. Joondeph says the medical and media establishments still avoid a serious reckoning. Vaccines, Boosters, Medical Honesty, and Future Emergencies The interview continues into vaccine claims, booster injuries, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, Big Pharma influence, and the loss of faith in medical institutions. Dr. Joondeph says public-health officials and media figures made overconfident promises about vaccines preventing infection and transmission, when they should have been honest about uncertainty. He compares this to surgical practice, where a physician explains risks and probabilities rather than guaranteeing an outcome. The conversation ends with a warning that another emergency could be attempted in the future, possibly under a different label such as climate, and that local, state, and federal elections will determine how much resistance is possible. Caller Comment, Fauci Allegations, and the WNBA Turn After Dr. Joondeph leaves, Julie reads listener comments about Fauci, and caller Sherrie raises allegations connected to the BBC documentary Guinea Pig Kids, Celia Farber, AIDS drug testing, orphan children, and unmarked graves. Julie says she has not heard those claims and will look into them, while also expressing skepticism. The show then turns to the WNBA, Caitlin Clark, Sophie Cunningham, and the transgender-athlete debate. Julie says Dr. Joondeph has written about the WNBA at American Thinker, and the hosts argue that the controversy exposes what they see as contradictions in claims about sex, gender identity, athletic fairness, and women’s sports. Royce White, Satire, and the WNBA Trans-Athlete Dilemma The hosts play an audio clip from former NBA player and political candidate Royce White, who says he sometimes identifies as a woman for the purposes of professional basketball and intends to declare for the WNBA draft. Julie and Chuck discuss this as satire meant to expose the league’s dilemma: if the league says it respects gender identity, what happens when male professional athletes claim eligibility for women’s basketball? They argue that the situation makes the debate absurd and forces the WNBA to confront the biological realities of elite athletic competition. The discussion remains framed through the hosts’ viewpoint and political-cultural commentary. Midterms, Cambridge, Equality Claims, and Closing Tease The closing section broadens into midterms, the possible balance of power in Congress, intelligence-community influence, pharmaceutical companies, and a Cambridge professor named Jason Arday. Julie describes Arday’s public backstory and says later scrutiny raised questions about his claims and scholarship. Chuck links the story to larger debates over equality, intelligence, sex differences, race, and institutional ideology, while Julie ties the same thinking back to the WNBA controversy. The episode closes with a preview of Janice Fiamengo’s upcoming appearance and thanks to Dr. Joondeph, the Zoom audience, BBS, and the show’s supporters.
Chuck and Julie Show with Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden
VIDEO: 1. El Sayed PROMO: Communism comes to Michigan as radical progressive El Sayed wins the Democrat Senate primary. What does that mean for Republicans? Please talk show legend Peter Boyles joins us live from Sturgis.
Chuck and Julie Show with Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden
Chuck And Julie Show with Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden Media Trust, Colorado’s Political Crossroads, COVID Accountability, and the Politics of Trust Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden examine newly discussed Fauci records, RFK Jr.’s exchange with Dana Bash, media and pharmaceutical influence, COVID-response accountability, listener concerns, Colorado politics, election integrity, jungle primaries, and the growing cultural debate around Caitlin Clark and the WNBA. RFK Jr. destroys CNN “parrot” Dana Bash over the media’s shameful role in the COVID Scam. Chuck and Julie Open With “Truth Straight Up” In this episode of The Chuck and Julie Show, Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden open with their trademark “truth straight up” format and immediately focus on newly discussed records connected to Dr. Anthony Fauci. The corrected transcript identifies Chuck and Julie as hosts, Jacob and Johnnie as listener participants, and notes that political, medical, legal, and election-related statements are preserved as speaker statements rather than independently verified claims. Fauci Records, RFK Jr., and the Dana Bash Interview Julie and Chuck argue that the records show Fauci knew more than he publicly acknowledged about COVID mortality, vaccines, masks, lockdowns, social distancing, and transmission. They discuss RFK Jr.’s CNN interview with Dana Bash, describing it as a moment where RFK Jr. challenged the media’s COVID-era assumptions and accused the press of failing its duty of skepticism. The hosts frame Dana Bash as unprepared for RFK Jr.’s depth of knowledge and argue that the interview exposed broader media failures around COVID coverage, public-health messaging, censorship, and pharmaceutical influence. Media Narratives, Pharmaceutical Advertising, and COVID Skepticism The hosts continue by criticizing how legacy media handled COVID dissent, saying that stories were first ignored, then attacked as “misinformation” when they gained traction. They discuss Denver’s Channel 7/ABC coverage, pharmaceutical advertising, hydroxychloroquine, vaccine messaging, and what they see as shifting public confidence in new shots. Julie shares a personal example from a school physical where her family declined several shots and the doctor said the office no longer carried the COVID shot. Chuck then suggests that pharmaceutical advertising may function less as direct product marketing and more as a way to influence networks and protect preferred narratives. Listener Participation: Jacob and Johnnie Join the Conversation After Julie leaves to pick up Rev, Chuck opens the program more fully to listeners. Jacob joins the discussion with his own concerns about COVID shots, pharmaceutical advertising, and vaccine mandates, including a reference to a Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan case involving employees and settlements. Johnnie shares a personal story about medication he says contributed to his blindness and connects that experience to distrust of medical authority and government messaging. Chuck responds by recalling public encounters involving Fauci, Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, and skeptical citizens who challenged official vaccine narratives. Blackmail, Human Nature, and Political Distrust Johnnie asks whether powerful people may be pressured by embarrassing information or blackmail, prompting Chuck to discuss the idea that Washington operates through mutual leverage and hidden knowledge. Chuck connects this to declining public trust in government, media, and political institutions. The conversation broadens into a darker reflection on human nature, corruption, and the way people create political myths about their own side being pure. Chuck argues that both parties have serious problems, though he focuses especially on what he sees as the Democratic Party’s weak bench and dependence on anti-Trump messaging rather than an attractive political vision. Colorado Politics, Republican Turnout, and Jungle Primaries Jacob then asks about Republican complicity, campaign volunteers, and voter follow-through. Chuck responds by describing Republicans as less reliable in lower-turnout races, while Democrats tend to bank votes early through mail ballots. The conversation shifts into Colorado politics, including jungle primaries, wealthy interests, county-party participation, Victor Marx, Greg Lopez, Kyle Clark, the governor’s race, and Mark Beasley’s low name recognition as a Republican U.S. Senate candidate. Chuck argues that jungle primaries sound inclusive but would reduce real grassroots participation by allowing wealthy interests to shape the candidate field. Election Integrity, the WNBA, and Closing Caller Roundtable Near the end of the episode, Chuck says a strong election-integrity law such as the SAVE Act, with voter-eligibility requirements and paper-ballot safeguards, could change Colorado’s political landscape. The show then takes a cultural turn into the WNBA, Sophie Cunningham, Caitlin Clark, and the way fan attention and league politics have made the sport more revealing and more interesting. Chuck thanks Jacob and Johnnie for joining, says the caller-driven format was fun, and closes by inviting a similar open-listener conversation in the future before signing off until Wednesday.
Recent guests on Chuck and Julie Show with Chuck Bonniwell and Julie Hayden. Study who booked and why before you pitch.
Sponsor detection runs nightly. Check back soon.
Based on semantic analysis of episode topics and host coverage, this show is a strong guest fit for executives in:
Industry fit is computed by PitchCentric using vector embeddings of the show's episode catalog.
Is this podcast yours and you'd like to remove or correct details? Request removal or email privacy@pitchcentric.com.
FAQs
If you have a concern about deliverability, AI quality, data privacy, or whether this will actually work for your specific situation, it's probably answered below.
Founder Solo gives you 50 AI pitches per month using the credit model (Standard pitches cost 1 credit, Enriched pitches cost 2). Founder Pro raises that to 200 credits per month and adds full Booking Probability access, unlimited Magic Match, Apollo enrichment credits, and data export capabilities. Both plans use the same credit system, so you can stretch your monthly budget further by using Standard-mode drafting.
Agency tiers have no base fee. You pay per managed client and per talent profile. Agency Standard is $199 per client per month; Agency Pro is $399 per client per month. Both add $39 per talent profile per month. Your own team's user seats are always free.
A talent profile represents one person (founder, executive, or spokesperson) you are booking onto podcasts. It includes their bio, topics, headshots, and outreach history. Team plans include 5 profiles; agency plans are pay-as-you-go.
Yes, at any time. Upgrades take effect immediately; downgrades apply at the end of the current billing period. Contact support if you need help migrating between plan families.
Every paid plan includes a 15-day free trial. Your card is saved at signup but you will not be charged until day 16. Cancel any time from your dashboard.
You keep access until the end of your current billing period. No charges after that. Your data is retained for 30 days in case you reactivate.
Yes. Select Annual on the pricing toggle and the discounted price is applied automatically at checkout. The annual price shown is the full year cost.
That is our Enterprise tier. Contact our sales team and we will build a custom plan with volume pricing, a dedicated account manager, and SLA guarantees.
