If politics and media leave you feeling angry, overwhelmed, or exhausted, Outrage Overload is for you. In about 30 minutes every few weeks, we explore how outrage spreads, how hyper-partisanship distorts perception, and how media and technology amplify emotional extremes. Through conversations with leading scientists, researchers, and authors, we unpack the psychology, incentives, and systems shaping today’s political climate — and offer practical tools to think clearly, stay grounded, and respond constructively. Outrage Overload helps listeners with critical questions about outrage culture, political polarization, misinformation, and media manipulation —offering science-based insight, expert interviews, and practical tools to stay grounded in a divided world. If you’ve ever asked yourself… • How can I stay politically informed without feeling outraged or exhausted all the time? •
Pitch Analysis
Required Pod Score for this show. PitchCentric checks your profile against host openness, topical fit, and audience signals before you generate a pitch.
Contact path
Verified email
Booking probability
35%
Guest openness
Selective
Verified email on file
80/100
Required Score
Sign up to generate a grounded pitch for Outrage Overload: Rethinking politics, division, and media.
What is Outrage Overload: Rethinking politics, division, and media?
Outrage Overload: Rethinking politics, division, and media is a science podcast hosted by David Beckemeyer, with 161 episodes on record and a Required Pod Score of 80. PitchCentric scores this show on Booking Probability, Listen Score, and live audience signals refreshed every 24 hours.
About the host
David Beckemeyer hosts Outrage Overload: Rethinking politics, division, and media, a science show with 161 episodes published.
Our AI reads these to draft pitches. Use them as grounding for a pitch that cites a real guest and a specific topic.
Episode #94
94. Making Politicians Accountable to Voters – Ramon Perez
Aug 12, 202628 min
Reimagining Democracy: Using AI and Mobile Tech to Break the Outrage Machine Congress currently sits at a near-record low approval rating, yet individual lawmakers are reelected over 90% of the time. Why is our political system so resistant to public accountability? In this episode, David Beckemeyer sits down with Ramon Perez , Executive Director of the Digital Democracy Project, to unpack the structural incentives that keep our political system locked in hyper-partisanship and outrage. Rather than offering soft "be nicer" solutions, Ramon outlines a direct, technology-driven counter-maneuver: leveraging secure mobile platforms and artificial intelligence to bypass political middlemen, translate complex legalese into plain text, and hold representatives directly accountable to their constituents. Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David Support the show Show Notes: https://outrageoverload.net/ Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com . Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload . We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload . Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com HOTLINE: 925-552-7885 Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here . Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it. Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites . Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C. Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen. Outrage Overload , a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
Outrage Overload: Rethinking politics, division, and media
Civic Voices: What Occupy Taught Us About Grassroots Power - Mila Atmos
Aug 5, 202628 min
When a public movement erupts, media attention almost immediately centers on the spectacle—the street confrontations, the viral headlines, and the rapid-fire political commentary. But once the news cycle moves on, we rarely stop to analyze how the information ecosystem shaped what we saw, or what actually happens to that momentum after the cameras leave. In this special episode of Outrage Overload , we sit down with Mila Atmos , host of the Future Hindsight podcast. Together, we revisit the 2011 Occupy Wall Street movement—operating right on the precipice of algorithm-driven social media—to explore how movement-building, media coverage, and police reactions shaped public trust, and what today’s exhausted majority can learn about driving real, long-term civic action. Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David Support the show Show Notes: https://outrageoverload.net/ Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com . Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload . We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload . Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com HOTLINE: 925-552-7885 Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here . Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it. Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites . Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C. Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen. Outrage Overload , a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
93. The Structural Battle for the DOJ – Alex Lovit
Jul 29, 202652 min
In February 2025, we explored how an expanding executive branch was stretching traditional boundaries. In this follow-up episode, we turn our attention to the primary institutional battleground of 2026: The Department of Justice (DOJ). The long-standing post-Watergate norm that the DOJ should operate independently from presidential control has been explicitly rejected by the current administration. Asserting total constitutional authority over all executive branch agencies under Article II, the administration argues that an independent DOJ is a constitutional myth. To break down the structural reality behind the headlines—including the rapid dismissal of indictments against political allies, the targeting of opponents, and mass civil service purges—we sit down with historian Alex Lovit , host of The Context (a sister podcast in The Democracy Group network). Together, we place the crisis of 2026 into historical perspective, tracing the design flaws and structural vulnerabilities of the DOJ from its founding in 1870 to the present day. Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David Support the show Show Notes: https://outrageoverload.net/ Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com . Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload . We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload . Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com HOTLINE: 925-552-7885 Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here . Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it. Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites . Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C. Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen. Outrage Overload , a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
Are we really trapped in a permanent political doom loop, or is the two-party duopoly actually more vulnerable than it looks? We often look at heavily gerrymandered, "safe" districts and hyper-partisan outrage and assume nothing can change until we get massive, far-off structural reform. But what if the major parties have aggressively optimized the system for a zero-sum, two-player game—and that very optimization has left them completely exposed to independent challenges? This week, David sits down with political campaign consultant Nathan Smolensky to break down the raw, data-driven mechanics of the independent landscape. Looking past the national presidential spectacle, Nathan explains why local and state races are a completely different playground for independent success, how candidates can flip the "spoiler effect" narrative on its head, and how scalable new campaign technologies are dismantling the traditional fundraising barrier to entry. Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David Support the show Show Notes: https://outrageoverload.net/ Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com . Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload . We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload . Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com HOTLINE: 925-552-7885 Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here . Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it. Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites . Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C. Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen. Outrage Overload , a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
Outrage Overload: Rethinking politics, division, and media
Bonus: "Occupy! An Unfinished Uprising" (from Future Hindsight)
Jul 8, 202641 min
Today we have a special bonus episode for the Outrage Overload community. We are sharing the premiere episode of a brand-new, six-part documentary series from our sister show in The Democracy Group network, Future Hindsight . The series is called Occupy! An Unfinished Uprising . About This Special Episode: In 2008, a Wall Street crash gutted millions of lives. It took until 2011 for the Left to answer—a call to protest went out, thousands came, and they tried to build an anti-capitalist village in Zuccotti Park. Told through the raw, unfiltered voices of the activists who camped there for almost two months, this series gets inside a movement that grew fast, felt transcendent and chaotic at once, and then violently flamed out. Want to hear the rest of the series? Occupy! An Unfinished Uprising is a six-part weekly series. To hear Episode 2 and follow the rest of the journey, subscribe to Future Hindsight on your favorite podcast app or visit FutureHindsight.com . Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David Support the show Show Notes: https://outrageoverload.net/ Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com . Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload . We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload . Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com HOTLINE: 925-552-7885 Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here . Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it. Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites . Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C. Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen. Outrage Overload , a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
Every question we get asked before someone starts their trial.
If you have a concern about deliverability, AI quality, data privacy, or whether this will actually work for your specific situation, it's probably answered below.
What is the difference between Founder Solo and Founder Pro?
Founder Solo gives you 50 AI pitches per month using the credit model (Standard pitches cost 1 credit, Enriched pitches cost 2). Founder Pro raises that to 200 credits per month and adds full Booking Probability access, unlimited Magic Match, Apollo enrichment credits, and data export capabilities. Both plans use the same credit system, so you can stretch your monthly budget further by using Standard-mode drafting.
How do agency tiers work?
Agency tiers have no base fee. You pay per managed client and per talent profile. Agency Standard is $199 per client per month; Agency Pro is $399 per client per month. Both add $39 per talent profile per month. Your own team's user seats are always free.
What is a talent profile?
A talent profile represents one person (founder, executive, or spokesperson) you are booking onto podcasts. It includes their bio, topics, headshots, and outreach history. Team plans include 5 profiles; agency plans are pay-as-you-go.
Can I switch plans later?
Yes, at any time. Upgrades take effect immediately; downgrades apply at the end of the current billing period. Contact support if you need help migrating between plan families.
Do you offer a free trial?
Every paid plan includes a 15-day free trial. Your card is saved at signup but you will not be charged until day 16. Cancel any time from your dashboard.
What happens if I cancel?
You keep access until the end of your current billing period. No charges after that. Your data is retained for 30 days in case you reactivate.
Is the 20% annual discount automatic?
Yes. Select Annual on the pricing toggle and the discounted price is applied automatically at checkout. The annual price shown is the full year cost.
What if I have more than 50 profiles or 20 clients?
That is our Enterprise tier. Contact our sales team and we will build a custom plan with volume pricing, a dedicated account manager, and SLA guarantees.
