Supreme Court Oral Arguments

A podcast feed of the audio recordings of the oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court. * Podcast adds new arguments automatically and immediately after they become available on supremecourt.gov * Detailed episode descriptions with facts about the case from oyez.org and links to docket and other information. * Convenient chapters to skip to any exchange between a justice and an advocate (available as soon as oyez.org publishes the transcript). Also available in video form at https://www.youtube.com/@SCOTUSOralArgument

Supreme Court Oral Arguments is a government podcast hosted by scotusstats.com, with 489 episodes on record and a Required Pod Score of 80. PitchCentric scores this show on Booking Probability, Listen Score, and live audience signals refreshed every 24 hours.

scotusstats.com hosts Supreme Court Oral Arguments, a government show with 489 episodes published.

Our AI reads these to draft pitches. Use them as grounding for a pitch that cites a real guest and a specific topic.

• 

  Supreme Court Oral Arguments

  [25-1083] Mullin v. Doe

  Apr 29, 20261h 46mS2025

  <p>Mullin v. Doe</p> <p>Justia · Docket · oyez.org</p> <p>Argued on Apr 29, 2026.</p> <p>Petitioner: Markwayne Mullin, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security.<br>Respondent: Dahlia Doe.</p> <p>Advocates: D. John Sauer (for the Petitioners) Ahilan T. Arulanantham (for the Respondents in Case No. 25-1083) Geoffrey M. Pipoly (for the Respondents in Case No. 25-1084)</p> <p><b>Facts of the case (from oyez.org)</b></p> <p>Congress created the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program to allow foreign nationals from countries experiencing armed conflict, natural disasters, or other extraordinary conditions to live and work legally in th...

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  Supreme Court Oral Arguments

  [24-889] Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.

  Apr 29, 20261 hourS2025

  <p>Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.</p> <p>Justia · Docket · oyez.org</p> <p>Argued on Apr 29, 2026.</p> <p>Petitioner: Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.<br>Respondent: Amarin Pharma, Inc.</p> <p>Advocates: Charles B. Klein (for the Petitioners) Malcolm L. Stewart (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners) Michael R. Huston (for the Respondents)</p> <p><b>Facts of the case (from oyez.org)</b></p> <p>Amarin Pharma markets icosapent ethyl under the brand name Vascepa. In 2012, the FDA approved Vascepa for treating severe hypertriglyceridemia (the SH indication), which affects patients with blood tr...

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  Supreme Court Oral Arguments

  [24-856] Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I

  Apr 28, 20261h 57mS2025

  <p>Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I</p> <p>Justia · Docket · oyez.org</p> <p>Argued on Apr 28, 2026.</p> <p>Petitioner: Cisco Systems, Inc.<br>Respondent: Doe I.</p> <p>Advocates: Kannon K. Shanmugam (for the Petitioners) Curtis E. Gannon (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioners) Paul L. Hoffman (for the Respondents)</p> <p><b>Facts of the case (from oyez.org)</b></p> <p>Beginning in the 1990s, the Chinese Communist Party initiated a campaign of persecution—referred to as “douzheng”—against practitioners of Falun Gong, a spiritual discipline derived from Buddhism that grew rapidly in popular...

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  Supreme Court Oral Arguments

  [25-112] Chatrie v. United States

  Apr 27, 20262 hourS2025

  <p>Chatrie v. United States</p> <p>Justia · Docket · oyez.org</p> <p>Argued on Apr 27, 2026.</p> <p>Petitioner: Okello T. Chatrie.<br>Respondent: United States of America.</p> <p>Advocates: Adam G. Unikowsky (for the Petitioner) Eric J. Feigin (for the Respondent)</p> <p><b>Facts of the case (from oyez.org)</b></p> <p>Okello Chatrie was arrested in connection with the armed robbery of a bank in Richmond, Virginia, where an individual entered the Call Federal Credit Union, threatened employees and patrons with a handgun, and escaped with $195,000. The robbery was captured by surveillance footage, which showed th...

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  Supreme Court Oral Arguments

  [24-1068] Monsanto Company v. Durnell

  Apr 27, 20261h 14mS2025

  <p>Monsanto Company v. Durnell</p> <p>Justia · Docket · oyez.org</p> <p>Argued on Apr 27, 2026.</p> <p>Petitioner: Monsanto Company.<br>Respondent: John L. Durnell.</p> <p>Advocates: Paul D. Clement (for the Petitioner) Sarah M. Harris (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the Petitioner) Ashley C. Keller (for the Respondent)</p> <p><b>Facts of the case (from oyez.org)</b></p> <p>John L. Durnell used Monsanto’s product Roundup, a herbicide containing the active ingredient glyphosate. Durnell subsequently developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, which he alleged was caused by his exposure to Roundup and glyphosate. In Jan...

  ListenShow Notes

Recent guests on Supreme Court Oral Arguments. Study who booked and why before you pitch.

Based on semantic analysis of episode topics and host coverage, this show is a strong guest fit for executives in:

Industry fit is computed by PitchCentric using vector embeddings of the show's episode catalog.