That KEVIN Show

From the heart of Times Square in New York City, Kevin McCullough takes America’s pulse — and delivers the shock it needs. THAT KEVIN SHOW doesn’t whisper opinions. It detonates them. With moral clarity, sharp wit, and genuine humor, McCullough has built one of the most loyal audiences in talk media.Fearless. Fast. Funny. Rooted in that rarest virtue — common sense. In a media world allergic to truth and laughter, THAT KEVIN SHOW stands apart — delivering unapologetic clarity across faith, politics, culture, and comedy. It’s talk radio that’s as entertaining as it is enlightening.

That KEVIN Show is a news podcast hosted by Unknown Host, with 149 episodes on record and a Required Pod Score of 80. PitchCentric scores this show on Booking Probability, Listen Score, and live audience signals refreshed every 24 hours.

Unknown Host hosts That KEVIN Show, a news show with 149 episodes published.

Our AI reads these to draft pitches. Use them as grounding for a pitch that cites a real guest and a specific topic.

• 

  That KEVIN Show

  Best Of Money Monday

  Aug 18, 20261h 21m

  Money Monday: Navigating the World of Gold and Silver This week on Money Monday, Kevin McCullough dives into the world of gold and silver, discussing the current market trends and the potential benefits of investing in these precious metals. With the US economy facing uncertain times, Kevin explores the idea of a potential financial reset and how gold and silver can provide a hedge against inflation and economic volatility. In this episode, Kevin is joined by David Fischer, a metals expert who shares his insights on the current market trends and the potential for a major bull market in gold. They discuss the recent surge in gold prices, the impact of the US Treasury's decision to sell euros to raise capital, and the implications of China's aggressive buying of gold. Kevin also shares his own experiences with investing in gold and silver, and how he believes they can provide a safe haven for investors. The conversation also touches on the importance of being aware of the candidates' views on key issues, such as defunding the police, and the need to critically evaluate their positions. Ryan Baitzel, a pastor from New Jersey, joins the show to discuss his favorite psalm, Psalm 27, and how it relates to living in a culture that often prioritizes fear over faith. As always, Kevin wraps up the episode with a discussion on money and investing, this time focusing on dividend-paying stocks. He's joined by Hillary Kramer, a millionaire maker who shares her insights on the importance of fundamental and macro investing. She recommends several stocks, including Array Technologies, Ford, and Verizon, and explains why she believes they have potential for growth. If you're interested in learning more about investing in gold and silver or want to hear more about the stocks Hillary recommends, tune in to the full episode of Money Monday to get the inside scoop. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  That KEVIN Show

  Thank You to the Nine

  Aug 14, 20261h 22m

  An Excerpt from Thank You to the Nine on Townhall.com I’ve always argued that life is the more bipartisan belief. Most days, the noise coming out of statehouses and cable news makes that argument hard to prove. This week, of all places, Massachusetts proved it. Gov. Maura Healey signed the Prioritizing Patient Access to Care Act this week, a bill that passed the state House 119-33 and eliminates statutory gestational limits on abortion, leaving the decision to a physician’s “professional medical judgment” at any point in a pregnancy, with expanded legal protection built in. Healey framed it as compassion, insisting families facing late complications shouldn’t have to leave the state to get care. State Rep. Jeffrey Turco of Winthrop framed it rather differently, and more accurately: “It allows abortion anytime, unrestricted, and in many cases, publicly funded until the moment of birth.” He didn’t stop there. “This new law represents an extremist and dangerous position,” he told Fox News Digital. “This law is barbaric.” Read that twice. That’s not a Republican talking point. That’s a Democrat, representing a Democratic district, in one of the bluest legislatures in America, using the word  barbaric  to describe his own party’s bill. He wasn’t alone. Nine House Democrats crossed the aisle to vote against this thing alongside every Republican in the chamber. State Rep. Chris Markey of Dartmouth called it “a very slippery slope” that puts doctors in an impossible ethical position and said plainly that you can be pro-choice and still see this law as “going beyond the norms of acceptability.” State Rep. Alan Silvia of Bristol pointed out an irony too sharp to ignore: “We go to extraordinary lengths as a society to protect vulnerable life, saving whales and saving strays, yet when it comes to an unborn child, that same sense of protection too often seems to disappear.”   See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  That KEVIN Show

  Two Women, Two Institutions, One Very Telling Week

  Aug 14, 20261h 22m

  An Excerpt from  Two Women, Two Institutions, One Very Telling Week on Townhall.com Some weeks hand you an argument. This one handed me something better: a picture. Two stories broke within hours of each other, on entirely different pages of the news, about entirely different institutions, and sitting side by side they say more about this cultural moment than either one says alone. Start with the WNBA. On Wednesday, the league convened its transgender athlete task force — again — and emerged with an update that amounted to a shrug wearing a press release. "We will continue to engage all league stakeholders in the coming weeks and months," the statement read, before pivoting to scold "bad-faith efforts" to use the debate to "demean or marginalize others." Translation: more meetings, more lecturing, still no answer. The league's own collective bargaining agreement states plainly that "only players who are women are eligible to play in the WNBA." Four hundred-plus pages, and nowhere in them does the WNBA actually define what a woman is. Two former NBA players, Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White, have already declared for the 2027 WNBA Draft specifically to expose the hole in the fence. The league's response to having that hole pointed out has been to hold more meetings about the fence. Meanwhile, Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham has stood alone, in public, defending the plain premise that women's sports and women's locker rooms should remain for women. For that, she's absorbed real physical punishment — most visibly a Flagrant 2 foul to the head and neck that ended with her on the receiving end of a "WHITE PRIVILEGE" accusation rather than an apology — and no shortage of online contempt from people who claim to care about protecting women. Her own coach only offered a full-throated defense after criticism mounted over the initial silence. So the people running the league that exists, by name and by charter, to celebrate women's athletic achievement can't bring themselves to say what a woman is. See the FULL ARTICLE at Townhall.com See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  That KEVIN Show

  BONUS RADIO: Wellness Wednesday w/Dr. Monique Yohanan

  Aug 13, 202637 min

  This week on Radio Night Live, the conversation gets heated as the host discusses the recent controversy surrounding President Trump's executive order on childhood vaccines. The order proposes splitting the MMR vaccine into three separate doses and allowing parents to space out their child's vaccinations. But what's behind the pushback from the medical community? Joining Kevin McCullough is Dr. Monique Yohanan, a medical expert and advocate for parental choice in healthcare. The discussion delves into the complexities of vaccine policy and the importance of considering individual circumstances when it comes to vaccination schedules. Dr. Yohanon shares her expertise on the topic, highlighting the need for a more nuanced approach that takes into account the unique needs of each child. The conversation also touches on the role of trust in the doctor-patient relationship and the importance of informed consent. As the debate around vaccine policy continues to rage, it's clear that there's more to the story than meets the eye. With Dr. Yohanan's insights and expertise, listeners will gain a deeper understanding of the issues at play and the need for a more personalized approach to healthcare. Don't miss this thought-provoking conversation on Radio Night Live. Tune in to hear the full discussion and join the conversation on the importance of parental choice in healthcare. See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  That KEVIN Show

  What's the Problem Here?

  Aug 13, 20261h 22m

  An Excerpt from What's the Problem Here? on Townhall.com I have some questions, and I'd genuinely like answers, because nobody seems to be offering any that hold up. This week, President Trump signed an executive order reshaping the childhood vaccine schedule — trimming the number of recommended shots, splitting the MMR vaccine into three separate doses instead of one combined injection, and directing more federal research into the causes of autism. Within hours, the predictable chorus arrived. Anonymous public health sources quoted in wire reports. Unnamed officials whispering to reporters. Advocacy groups warning the sky is falling. A Public Citizen spokesman called it a "mindless anti-scientific assault." Doctors' associations lined up to push back. A federal judge has already blocked a prior version of similar changes after the American Academy of Pediatrics sued. Here's my actual question, asked in good faith: what, precisely, is the problem? Is it that spacing out vaccines poses some documented, catastrophic risk to children? Because I'll tell you what happened at my house this week. We brought home two new kittens, and at the vet, we were offered the option — routine, unremarkable, no hand-wringing required — to space out their vaccinations rather than deliver everything in one sitting. Nobody at that veterinary clinic accused us of "anti-science assault" for asking a scheduling question about a kitten's immune system. So why is the same basic question, asked about a human infant's immune system, treated as an act of civilizational sabotage? Is the concern that splitting the MMR into three shots instead of one somehow reduces effectiveness? Because if so, that's a specific, testable claim, and I'd like to see it argued specifically rather than gestured at anonymously. Saying "this is dangerous" from behind a cloak of anonymity isn't science. It's a talking point wearing a lab coat. Or is the real objection simpler and far less noble than public health? Is it that these officials, many of whom built entire careers on being unquestioned, cannot stomach a White House that keeps asking them to show their work? Because that's a different problem entirely, and it's one worth naming directly. See the FULL ARTICLE on Townhall.com                                 Back to School Giveaway 2026 - That Kevin Show Backpacks, supplies, clothes, technology—whatever your family needs for school - our  Back-to-School Sweepstakes  could help. You could receive $1,000 cash for a shopping spree PLUS choose a school or charity to receive a $1,000 donation in your name. It's a win for your family AND your community. Enter once daily to increase your opportunity to win! See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  ListenShow Notes

Recent guests on That KEVIN Show. Study who booked and why before you pitch.

Based on semantic analysis of episode topics and host coverage, this show is a strong guest fit for executives in:

Industry fit is computed by PitchCentric using vector embeddings of the show's episode catalog.