
Episode #64
Zachary Bleemer on the Stratification of American Higher Education
In the United States, the most well-resourced universities largely admit the highest-scoring students, while the least-resourced serve students with the lowest scores. But if individual achievement is shaped not only by ability, but also by family resources, school quality, parental education, and other circumstances, what are the inequality implications of a higher education system that concentrates resources among students who may already be well-equipped to succeed? What if universities instead broadened their support to include students for whom that support generates the greatest gains? Our guest today is among the foremost scholars examining the inner workings of American higher education, offering new insights into educational access, affirmative action, and the consequences of these choices for the labor market—and challenging us to rethink what we believe higher education is supposed to do. Zachary Bleemer is an economist at Princeton and the author of several studies on American higher education and its consequences for inequality. In this conversation with hosts Steven Durlauf and Damon Jones, he discusses university policies that limit access to certain majors; the successes of affirmative action, both in creating a more integrated student body and improving the economic well-being of its beneficiaries; and the effects of the Vietnam War on Black veterans.

