The Wills and Estates Transmission

The Wills and Estates transmission podcast brought to you by de Groots, specialist Wills and Estate lawyers

The Wills and Estates Transmission is a business podcast hosted by Unknown Host, with 34 episodes on record and a Required Pod Score of 80. PitchCentric scores this show on Booking Probability, Listen Score, and live audience signals refreshed every 24 hours.

Unknown Host hosts The Wills and Estates Transmission, a business show with 34 episodes published.

Our AI reads these to draft pitches. Use them as grounding for a pitch that cites a real guest and a specific topic.

• 

  The Wills and Estates Transmission

  Episode 35: risks of an informal will

  Aug 17, 202617 min

  In this episode of the Wills and Estates Podcast , Tony speaks with Emma from de Groots about the risks of informal wills and why handwritten notes, text messages or other documents can create serious complications for an estate. Emma explains the formal requirements for a valid will and what can happen when those requirements are not followed. In some circumstances, a Court may recognise an informal document as a will, but that can create additional uncertainty, cost and delay. The discussion also covers what can happen when someone writes changes directly onto an existing will and whether those handwritten amendments could be treated as an informal codicil. What is an informal will? What are the formal requirements for making a valid will? Can a handwritten note be treated as a will? Can a text message or video recording contain testamentary wishes? What happens if you write changes directly onto an existing will? What is an informal codicil? Why executors may need to bring informal documents to the Court’s attention The additional cost and delay informal wills can create Why properly updating a will is safer than relying on informal changes An informal document may sometimes be recognised as a will, but relying on that process can create uncertainty and additional legal expense. If you want to make or change a will, the safer approach is to obtain proper legal advice and ensure the document is prepared and executed correctly. In This EpisodeKey Takeaway

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  The Wills and Estates Transmission

  Episode 34: One Conversation Does Not a Property Transfer Make

  Aug 2, 202615 min

  In this episode of the Wills and Estates Transmission Podcast , Tony speaks with Julia Tutt from de Groots about what can happen when family assumptions, verbal promises and estate planning do not match. The discussion centres on Tarazi v Paras [2026] NSWSC 369 , a New South Wales Supreme Court case involving three daughters and a property in Ashbury. Two of the daughters claimed their father had verbally promised the property to them. However, his will divided the property between all three daughters. Julia explains why a family understanding or a single conversation may not be enough to establish a legal entitlement to property. She also discusses proprietary estoppel, the importance of documenting significant arrangements and the responsibilities of executors. The case also provides a warning for executors who delay administering an estate. Ignoring an estate or waiting for time to pass does not remove the obligation to deal with it properly. Can a verbal promise determine who receives a property? What is proprietary estoppel? Why family “lore” can lead to disputes Why important arrangements should be documented What happens when executors fail to administer an estate Whether the eldest child has greater inheritance rights How an executor should be chosen Why families need to have difficult estate planning conversations Do not rely on assumptions, informal conversations or family stories about who will inherit a property. Have the conversation, obtain proper advice and make sure the intended arrangement is clearly documented. Tarazi v Paras [2026] NSWSC 369 This podcast provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legal advice should be obtained for individual circumstances. In This EpisodeKey TakeawayCase DiscussedDisclaimer

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  The Wills and Estates Transmission

  Episode 33: Estrangement and Family Provision

  Jun 28, 202620 min

  In this episode of De Groots with DeGroots , Tony Skinner speaks with Elizabeth Lorimer about estrangement in family provision applications. Elizabeth explains that estrangement is a factor the court may consider, but it is not an automatic barrier to a claim. The discussion covers how courts assess need, the difference between estrangement and disentitling conduct, why family provision cases are highly fact-specific, and why simply leaving someone out of a will does not guarantee they cannot make a claim. The episode also looks at practical considerations for will makers, including the importance of documenting reasons for unequal provision and understanding how courts may treat long-term family breakdowns. Estrangement can be relevant in a family provision application, but it is only one factor among many. The court will still consider the size of the estate, the applicant’s need, competing claims, and the relationship between the applicant and the deceased. Elizabeth notes that many family provision applications settle at mediation, particularly in Queensland where mediation is mandatory. Even so, lawyers still need to prepare the case as if it may ultimately be heard by the court. A central issue in family provision law is whether the applicant has been adequately provided for. The applicant’s financial need is often the critical factor. Without need, the court may not have power to make further provision. Elizabeth explains that estrangement may involve a long breakdown in the relationship, lack of contact, distance, or family conflict. Disentitling conduct is much more serious and may involve violence, serious theft, abuse, or other gross behaviour. Elizabeth is clear that there is no foolproof way to exclude a child from making a family provision claim. A child’s eligibility remains, even where there has been long-term estrangement. Leaving a reason in the will or a separate document may help provide context, but it is not a guarantee

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  The Wills and Estates Transmission

  Episode 32 : Elder Abuse and the Role of the Solicitor

  May 25, 202617 minS0

  <p>In this episode of the Wills & Estates Transmission Podcast with de Groots, Tony Skinner speaks with Maree Harris about elder abuse and the important role solicitors can play in identifying warning signs, protecting vulnerable clients, and ensuring estate planning instructions are genuinely coming from the client.</p><p>Elder abuse is a growing concern, especially as Australia’s population ages and more families deal with estate planning, powers of attorney, capacity and intergenerational wealth.</p><p>Maree explains what elder abuse is, the different forms it can take, and why psychological, emotional and financial abuse are often the most co...

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  The Wills and Estates Transmission

  Episode 31: Planning the inevitable. Who steps in when you're gone?

  Apr 19, 202614 minS0

  <p>In this episode, Julia Tutt discusses the legal and emotional aspects of funerals, burial rights, and organ donation, emphasising the importance of communication and planning for end-of-life arrangements.</p><p>Key topics</p>Role of executor in funeral arrangementsLegal distinction between wishes and binding directivesImportance of discussing end-of-life wishes with familyOrgan donation procedures and legal considerationsCase study on funeral disputes and court intervention<p><br></p>

  ListenShow Notes

Recent guests on The Wills and Estates Transmission. Study who booked and why before you pitch.

Based on semantic analysis of episode topics and host coverage, this show is a strong guest fit for executives in:

Industry fit is computed by PitchCentric using vector embeddings of the show's episode catalog.