We Win Injury Law

From high-profile cases to the everyday fight for your rights, the courtroom is where battles are won and lost. But who really has the upper hand? Welcome to We Win Injury Law, the podcast that takes you inside the biggest legal battles, breaks down real injury cases, and gives you the knowledge to stand up for yourself when it matters most. I’m Tyler, and whether it’s a headline lawsuit or the kind of accident that turns your world upside down, we’re here to help you understand the law, the strategy, and what it really takes to win. Because at the end of the day, we don’t just fight, we win for you. Period

We Win Injury Law is a education podcast hosted by Tyler Todd, with 79 episodes on record and a Required Pod Score of 80.

Tyler Todd hosts We Win Injury Law, a education show with 79 episodes published.

Our AI reads these to draft pitches. Use them as grounding for a pitch that cites a real guest and a specific topic.

• 

  Episode #77

  S1EP77: The Trials of Injury Law | Understanding Postpartum and Legal Complexities...

  Sep 29, 202635 minS1

  Lindsay Clancy Trial Update & How a Rear-End Crash Became a Six-Figure Settlement | We Win Injury Law Podcast Hosts Tyler Todd and Jaren Sandberg open with an update on the Lindsay Clancy trial, which ended in a mistrial after a 12-person jury could not reach a unanimous decision on whether Clancy was criminally responsible for the deaths of her three children. The jury was reportedly divided 11–1, with one juror holding a different position from the other 11. Tyler and Jaren discuss the public reaction surrounding the jurors, the debate over postpartum psychosis and criminal responsibility, the defense's arguments regarding Clancy's mental health and medication, and the broader question of how highly publicized cases and social media can shape public perceptions of a trial. They also discuss the possible next steps in the case, while prosecutors had not announced whether they would pursue a retrial at the time of the discussion. The conversation then shifts to a real Utah personal injury case involving a rear-end collision that ultimately resulted in a significant six-figure settlement. The hosts explain how the case came to the firm through a chiropractor referral and discuss Utah's personal injury protection system, including the $3k minimum PIP medical-benefit amount under Utah law. The client continued experiencing headaches, neck and back pain, and neurological symptoms following the crash and received treatment through pain management and a concussion clinic. After the insurance company made a low pre-suit offer that did not adequately account for the medical expenses and injuries involved, the firm filed a lawsuit, took depositions, developed the medical evidence, and prepared the case for mediation. Tyler and Jaren explain why some injury cases cannot be fairly evaluated through a quick settlement offer, how depositions and medical documentation can affect negotiations, and why insurers must account for the specific evidence and risks presented by each case. The episode ultimately highlights the work that can happen behind the scenes between an accident and a successful settlement. Topics covered: * Lindsay Clancy trial update * Massachusetts criminal responsibility * Postpartum psychosis and the insanity defense * Jury deliberations and a mistrial * Public reaction and social media surrounding trials * Possible next steps in the Clancy case * Utah rear-end accident claims * Utah PIP coverage * Chiropractor referrals and injury cases * Headaches and neck/back injuries after a crash * Concussion and neurological symptoms * Pain management and continued medical treatment * Pre-suit settlement offers * Filing a personal injury lawsuit * Depositions * Medical evidence * Mediation and settlement negotiations * Why some injury cases take time to resolve * Client-focused personal injury representation If you or someone you love has been injured in a car accident, motorcycle accident, or another type of accident in Utah, contact We Win Injury Law to learn more about your legal options and schedule a free consultation. We Win Injury Law | Serving communities throughout Utah St. George | Cedar City | Hurricane | Orem | Salt Lake County WE WIN FOR YOU. PERIOD. Connect with us: TikTok: @‌wewininjurylaw Instagram: @‌wewininjurylaw LinkedIn: We Win Injury Law Get a free consultation: wewininjurylaw.com

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  Episode #76

  S1EP76: We Win Injury Law: Unpacking the HYROX Controversy and Settlement Success

  Sep 24, 202636 minS1

  HYROX Controversy, Athlete Safety & A Two-Year Motorcycle Crash Settlement | We Win Injury Law Podcast Hosts Tyler Todd and Jaren Sandberg recap a HYROX weekend in Salt Lake City, explain what HYROX is, and discuss the controversy surrounding the 2026 HYROX Beijing event after Australian athlete Joanna Wietrzyk experienced sudden fecal incontinence during the race and continued competing. The incident sparked significant online backlash, and HYROX co-founder Moritz Fürste later apologized, saying organizers should have intervened and announcing new procedures for similar situations. The conversation then shifts from sports and safety to personal injury law with a motorcycle-versus-car case that settled through mediation approximately two years after the crash. The hosts discuss the evidence involved, including allegations that the driver failed to yield after running a stop sign, witness testimony, and dash-cam footage. They also break down the defense's allegations that the motorcyclist was traveling 15–20 mph over the posted 25 mph speed limit and was impaired, as well as the role expert testimony and evidence disputes can play in a personal injury case. Tyler and Jaren also explain Utah's comparative-negligence rules and how allegations of fault against an injured person can affect a potential recovery. Under Utah law, a plaintiff may recover when their share of fault does not meet or exceed the combined fault threshold specified by statute. The episode also discusses Utah Rule of Evidence 403 and how courts can exclude relevant evidence when its probative value is substantially outweighed by risks such as unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, or misleading the jury. Finally, the hosts discuss the settlement process, the risks both sides face when preparing a case for trial, and why evidence can significantly affect the value and outcome of a motorcycle accident claim. Topics covered: * HYROX Salt Lake City * The HYROX Beijing controversy * Athlete and spectator safety * Sportsmanship vs. health and safety * Motorcycle accident claims * Failure to yield and stop-sign crashes * Dash-cam and witness evidence * Allegations of speeding and impairment * Comparative negligence in Utah * Expert witnesses in personal injury cases * Utah Rule of Evidence 403 * Mediation and settlement negotiations * Motorcycle injury cases If you or someone you love has been injured in a motorcycle accident or another type of accident, contact We Win Injury Law to learn more about your legal options and schedule a free consultation. We Win Injury Law | Serving communities throughout Utah St. George | Cedar City | Hurricane | Orem | Salt Lake County WE WIN FOR YOU. PERIOD. Connect with us: TikTok: @‌wewininjurylaw Instagram: @‌wewininjurylaw LinkedIn: We Win Injury Law Get a free consultation: wewininjurylaw.com

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  Episode #75

  S1EP75: We Win Injury Law Podcast | Justice for Tupac: The Unfolding Mystery...

  Sep 15, 202632 minS1

  Justice for Tupac: 30 Years Later, Duane “Keefe D” Davis Convicted On the We Win Injury Law Podcast, hosts Tyler Todd and Jaren Sandberg discuss the 30-year mystery surrounding Tupac Shakur’s 1996 Las Vegas shooting and the recent 2026 conviction of Duane “Keefe D” Davis for first-degree murder with deadly weapon and gang-involvement enhancements, with sentencing set for October 13 and potential life in prison. They talk about Tupac’s music, fame, and long-running “still alive” conspiracy theories, noting Davis’s 2019 memoir and other statements were used against him. The conversation broadens to themes of delayed justice, accountability, and enhancements in criminal sentencing, including an anecdote about a “sweet grandma” charged via a gun enhancement, plus concerns about violence, social media, video games, and recent campus and family tragedies. They close by relating justice in criminal cases to compensation. 00:00 Podcast Welcome 00:35 Where Were You in 1996 01:09 Tupac Favorites and Rap Era 05:41 Tupac Alive Conspiracy 08:40 New Arrest and Vegas Shooting 09:49 Justice After 30 Years 11:22 Memoir Confession Evidence 12:24 Verdict and Sentencing Details 13:44 Enhancements and Did He Do It 14:50 Why Would He Admit It 15:44 Thug Life Banter 15:56 Adrenaline And Normalcy 16:37 Sweet Grandma Trial 20:46 Violence And Media 25:04 Justice And Accountability 26:31 Campus Chaos Liability 30:21 Tupac Wrap Up ABOUT WE WIN INJURY LAW The We Win Injury Law Podcast breaks down real cases, major legal stories, personal injury law, liability, insurance, negligence, current events, and the legal questions behind the headlines. Based in Utah, We Win Injury Law helps injured people understand their rights and navigate complex legal situations. We Win Injury Law | Serving communities throughout Utah St. George | Cedar City | Hurricane | Orem | Salt Lake County SUBSCRIBE TO THE CHANNEL! WE WIN FOR YOU. PERIOD. Connect with us: TikTok: @‌wewininjurylaw Instagram: @‌wewininjurylaw LinkedIn: We Win Injury Law Get a free consultation: wewininjurylaw.com

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  Episode #74

  S1EP74: Social Media Obsession & Meta's Billion-Dollar Youth Safety Settlement | We Win Injury Podcast

  Sep 8, 202642 minS1

  Lindsay Clancy Trial, Social Media Obsession & Meta's Billion-Dollar Youth Safety Settlement | We Win Injury Law Podcast... Why are we so obsessed with watching trials unfold in real time? From viral courtroom clips and TikTok theories to one of the most closely watched trials in America, social media is changing the way the public follows and reacts to the legal system. In this episode of the We Win Injury Law Podcast , Tyler Todd and Jaron Sandberg discuss the public fascination with high-profile trials, the Lindsay Clancy case, social media algorithms, criminal responsibility, and the major multistate legal action involving Meta and youth safety. THE LINDSAY CLANCY CASE At the time this episode was recorded, the jury in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial had spent five days deliberating and reported that it was unable to reach a unanimous decision. The case centered on a devastating and largely undisputed question: What happened and was Lindsay Clancy legally criminally responsible for her actions? Clancy admitted to killing her three children in 2023. Her defense argued that she was suffering from severe mental illness and should not be held criminally responsible, while prosecutors argued that she acted deliberately and understood her actions. The jury was ultimately unable to reach a unanimous verdict, and a judge declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026. A mistrial is not a conviction or an acquittal, and the future of the criminal case remains subject to further legal proceedings. META, SOCIAL MEDIA & YOUTH SAFETY The conversation then turns to one of the biggest technology and consumer-protection stories in the country. Utah and dozens of other states reached a major agreement with Meta over allegations concerning the safety of young people on Facebook and Instagram. The states alleged that Meta used features that encouraged excessive use by young people and failed to adequately protect younger users from certain harms. Those were legal allegations not findings made by a jury after trial. The agreement includes substantial financial payments and proposed changes involving youth safety, age assurance, parental tools, and how certain platform features operate for younger users. The agreement remains subject to the applicable legal approval process. As technology becomes a bigger part of everyday life, questions about corporate responsibility, product design, consumer protection, and personal accountability are becoming more complicated than ever. WHY ARE TRIALS BECOMING ENTERTAINMENT? Court cases that once received limited media coverage can now generate millions of views overnight. A single clip can go viral. A witness can become a meme. And millions of people can develop strong opinions about a case without ever seeing the full evidence presented in court. We discuss whether social media is giving the public greater access to the justice system or creating a new problem where algorithms and viral moments influence public perception before a case is fully understood. ⏱️ TIMESTAMPS 00:00 — Podcast Welcome 00:28 — Why Are Trials Trending? 01:14 — What We're Discussing Today 02:09 — Holy War Rivalry Talk 03:30 — BYU & Hawaii Sports Memories 05:48 — Lindsay Clancy Jury Deliberations 10:14 — The Question of Intent and Planning 12:26 — Questions and Online Theories 14:54 — Breaking Down the Defense Strategy 15:40 — Trial Surprises & Predictions 19:15 — Questions About the Investigation 20:27 — Why Accident Investigations Matter 22:32 — The Importance of Reconstruction 24:01 — Clancy Trial Predictions 25:00 — How Algorithms Shape Trial Opinions 29:32 — The Meta Settlement Debate 32:44 — Social Media and Alleged Addiction by Design 36:35 — Corporate vs. Personal Responsibility 40:23 — Final Thoughts & Updates ABOUT WE WIN INJURY LAW The We Win Injury Law Podcast breaks down real cases, major legal stories, personal injury law, liability, insurance, negligence, current events, and the legal questions behind the headlines. Based in Utah, We Win Injury Law helps injured people understand their rights and navigate complex legal situations. We Win Injury Law | Serving communities throughout Utah St. George | Cedar City | Hurricane | Orem | Salt Lake County WE WIN FOR YOU. PERIOD. Connect with us: TikTok: @‌wewininjurylaw Instagram: @‌wewininjurylaw LinkedIn: We Win Injury Law Get a free consultation: wewininjurylaw.com

  ListenShow Notes
• 

  Episode #73

  S1EP73: Postpartum Psychosis or Family Annihilation? A Legal Exploration

  Sep 1, 202643 minS1

  The Clancy Case: Postpartum Psychosis, Criminal Responsibility & Trial Strategy | We Win Injury Law Podcast The Lindsay Clancy case has become one of the most widely discussed criminal cases in recent years, raising difficult questions about postpartum mental health, criminal responsibility, trial strategy, and the legal system . In this episode of the We Win Injury Law Podcast , attorneys Tyler Todd and Jaron Sandberg discuss the publicly reported allegations and legal issues surrounding the Massachusetts case while emphasizing an important fact: at the center of every high-profile criminal case are real people and a devastating tragedy. The conversation examines the deaths of Lindsay Clancy's three children and the criminal case against her. Lindsay Clancy has been charged in connection with their deaths, and her mental health before the tragedy has become a major part of the legal discussion surrounding the case. The hosts discuss the difference between mental illness and criminal responsibility , the legal arguments surrounding postpartum psychosis and psychiatric treatment, and how attorneys may approach evidence involving a defendant's mental state. The prosecution has the burden of proving the charges under the applicable legal standard. Attorneys, judges, witnesses, experts, and jurors all play different roles in determining how the legal process unfolds. This episode discusses the publicly available information and legal issues surrounding the Clancy case. Allegations, legal arguments, testimony, and online theories should not automatically be treated as established facts. TIMESTAMPS 00:00 — Podcast Welcome 00:32 — Why This Case Grabs Public Attention 01:25 — Victims Versus the Trial Spectacle 04:21 — Understanding Trial Strategy 06:30 — The Clancy Case and Publicly Reported Facts 08:01 — Therapist Testimony and Cross-Examination 10:21 — Why Attorneys Object in Court 12:12 — Comparing High-Profile Trials 13:51 — Prosecution Strategy and Legal Theories 16:39 — Should a Defendant Testify? 18:16 — What Courtroom Demeanor Can and Can't Tell Us 21:11 — A Personal Courtroom Experience 21:39 — Courtroom and Venue Discussions 22:35 — Lessons About Courtroom Demeanor 23:54 — Postpartum Mental Health and the Defense Strategy 25:46 — Examining Video and Online Theories 26:43 — Reasonable Doubt and Jury Strategy 28:44 — The Medical Malpractice Lawsuit 31:03 — Rumors, Speculation, and the Importance of Evidence 34:44 — The Timeline and Mental Health Debate 39:12 — Verdict Predictions and Legal Analysis 41:55 — Wrap Up and Future Case Updates About the We Win Injury Law Podcast The We Win Injury Law Podcast breaks down real legal cases, personal injury law, wrongful death, negligence, insurance, liability, major lawsuits, current events, and the legal questions behind the headlines. Based in Utah, We Win Injury Law helps injured people understand their legal rights and navigate complex personal injury claims. From car accidents and truck accidents to wrongful death, dangerous property, insurance disputes, and other serious injury cases, we believe people deserve to understand how the legal system works. Serving communities throughout Utah, including: St. George | Cedar City | Hurricane | Orem | Salt Lake County WE WIN FOR YOU. PERIOD. Connect with us: TikTok: @‌wewininjurylaw Instagram: @‌wewininjurylaw LinkedIn: We Win Injury Law Get a free consultation: wewininjurylaw.com

  ListenShow Notes

Recent guests on We Win Injury Law. Study who booked and why before you pitch.

Based on semantic analysis of episode topics and host coverage, this show is a strong guest fit for executives in:

Industry fit is computed by PitchCentric using vector embeddings of the show's episode catalog.